AIA members lead the way in maintaining the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and competence. The AIA Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct is both a guide and a measurement of the standards of practice.
Architects Firm owners Business Intelligence Firm ManagementArchitecture as a practice is based on a moral foundation of professionalism, with responsibilities to the general public, our respective clients, the profession itself, our colleagues, and the shared environment that surrounds all of us. For members of The American Institute of Architects (AIA), the concise language of the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct is both a guide and measuring stick for professional behavior.
In 1909, AIA first adopted a formal set of rules governing the conduct of architects. The rules were published as “A Circular of Advice Relative to Principles of Professional Practice and the Canons of Ethics.” According to the National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB), only four states (Illinois, New Jersey, California, and Colorado) had by that time adopted laws regulating the practice of architecture. As a result, AIA’s rules served to set standards for practice in much of the country. AIA periodically revised its ethical code in mostly limited ways during the ensuing 60 years.
State governments and their agencies enjoy various powers and privileges that do not extend to other types of organizations or to individuals. As a result, both the scope of professional rules adopted by AIA and the manner of their enforcement by AIA necessarily differ from what registration boards may do.
Antitrust law imposes significant restrictions on what conduct AIA can mandate or prohibit in a code of ethics for its members. Although antitrust law is complex, its general purpose is to foster economic competition. One way that antitrust law accomplishes this goal is to prevent competitors in a given market from acting together to unreasonably restrain competition. Because the members of AIA are competitors of each other, AIA activities cannot be carried out with the purpose or effect of reducing competition in ways that courts have found to be unreasonable, that is, without having an offsetting precompetitive effect.
Some subjects were covered in pre-1980 versions of AIA’s code of ethics but are no longer, mostly as a result of restrictions imposed by antitrust law. Prominent in the list of such subjects is any restriction pertaining to fees or compensation for services. In a 1978 appeal by the National Society of Professional Engineers, the U.S. Supreme Court specifically held that a professional association’s ethical code may not prohibit competitive bidding—despite the argument that such a regulation would further public health, welfare, and safety.
The absence of ethical provisions regarding fees has a broader effect than just competitive bidding or minimum fee amounts, however. There is no ethical restriction on providing free services whether or not part of marketing; providing services at no charge is, of course, simply charging a fee of zero. Similarly, there are no ethical restrictions specifically pertaining to design competitions, which amount to providing services for no fee or a very small fee.
Other subjects no longer prohibited by the AIA Code of Ethics include:
The Code is arranged in three tiers of statements: Canons, Ethical Standards, and Rules of Conduct.
Canon I: General Obligations
Members should maintain and advance their knowledge of the art and science of architecture, respect the body of architectural accomplishment, contribute to its growth, thoughtfully consider the social and environmental impact of their professional activities, and exercise learned and uncompromised professional judgment.
Canon II: Obligations to the Public
Members should embrace the spirit and letter of the law governing their professional affairs and should promote and serve the public interest in their personal and professional activities.
Canon III: Obligations to the Client
Members should serve their clients competently and in a professional manner and should exercise unprejudiced and unbiased judgment when performing all professional services.
Canon IV: Obligations to the Profession
Members should uphold the integrity and dignity of the profession.
Canon V: Obligations to Colleagues
Members should respect the rights and acknowledge the professional aspirations and contributions of their colleagues.
Canon VI: Obligations to the Environment
Members should promote sustainable design and development principles in their professional activities.
The bylaws of AIA establish the processes under which the ethical code is adopted, amended, and enforced. The bylaws provide for the establishment of a National Ethics Council, which has the authority to interpret the Code of Ethics. Individual members, officers, directors, employees, and officers and staff of state and local components of AIA do not have this authority.
The National Ethics Council is the body charged by the bylaws to enforce ethical matters in the practice of architecture, in accordance with current, published editions of the Code of Ethics and Rules of Procedure. It does so through the process of complaint and response, measuring ethical behavior as defined by the Code. The Council also considers proposed changes to the Code for adoption by the Board of Directors or membership of AIA and may itself propose revisions.
Composition of and Appointments to the Council
As established by AIA’s bylaws, the National Ethics Council consists of up to 12 architect members of AIA, appointed by the Board of Directors to staggered three-year terms. Typically, the Council operates with seven members, each of whom generally is reappointed to a second three-year term. Individual terms are staggered to enhance institutional memory since Council members are not permitted to serve more than two consecutive three-year terms.
Promulgation of the Code of Ethics
The National Ethics Council’s page contains the current Code of Ethics, supporting documentation, and all necessary forms. In addition to violation notices published upon the conclusion of a case, decisions of the Council are also published in redacted form, that is, with names, places, and other identifying information removed.
How the Code Itself Is Modified
AIA’s bylaws provide two means for amending the Code of Ethics. AIA’s Board of Directors is empowered to adopt amendments at any time. In addition, the members as a whole, through a vote of their delegates at an annual meeting, may adopt amendments. Typically, amendments have been made by the Board.
How the Rules of Procedure Are Modified
The National Ethics Council is given authority by AIA’s bylaws to adopt the rules under which it operates, subject to specific requirements set by the bylaws themselves. The rules under which appeals are taken are established by the bylaws and the Board of Directors.
AIA collects and disseminates Best Practices as a service to AIA members without endorsement or recommendation. Appropriate use of the information provided is the responsibility of the reader.
Help build AIA Best Practices by contributing your experience. Contact us with your feedback or ideas for an article.